From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steyer v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2023
2:23-cv-01578-KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01578-KJN

10-03-2023

Samuel Steyer, Plaintiff, v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Samuel Steyer and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. jointly move this Court for an extension of time for Defendant to file its responsive pleading in this case.

For good cause shown, the Joint Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint is hereby GRANTED. Defendant has up to October 26, 2023, to file its responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Steyer v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2023
2:23-cv-01578-KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Steyer v. Uber Techs.

Case Details

Full title:Samuel Steyer, Plaintiff, v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01578-KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2023)