From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Wilkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 26, 1987
127 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

February 26, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Torraca, J.).


Plaintiff was injured when the vehicle she was driving was involved in a collision with another vehicle, struck two boulders on the side of the highway and overturned. She commenced this action against the driver of the other vehicle, the Town of New Scotland, the County of Albany and Anthony Donato, the owner of the property where her car overturned. With respect to Donato, she alleged that the two boulders were located approximately 8 and 11 feet, respectively, from the shoulder of the road and that Donato was negligent in placing the boulders in that location because they created a dangerous condition for highway travelers. Donato moved to dismiss the complaint against him pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), and the motion was granted. This appeal ensued.

As always in a negligence action, a plaintiff is required to allege in her complaint facts showing (1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant, (2) an act or omission by the defendant constituting negligence, and (3) damages (4 Carmody-Wait 2d, N.Y. Prac § 29:344, at 560-561). Ordinarily, a landowner is not liable for an injury to a traveler arising from a collision with an object on the landowner's property; such object must be located within the highway right-of-way in order to impose liability (see, Hayes v. Malkan, 26 N.Y.2d 295, 298-299). Thus, in this case there is no duty owed to plaintiff by Donato unless the boulders were located within the highway right-of-way. At no place in the complaint does plaintiff allege that the boulders were located within the right-of-way, and the complaint therefore does not allege a duty owed by Donato to plaintiff. Accordingly, Special Term did not err in dismissing the complaint.

Order affirmed, without costs. Main, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Wilkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 26, 1987
127 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Stewart v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:MARY B.K. STEWART, Appellant, v. ROSE WILKINSON et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Donato

A motion to renew must be based upon new facts (see, Matter of Hooker v Town Bd., 60 A.D.2d 684). We find no…

New York v. SCA Services, Inc.

SCA, as the proponent of a claim based on negligence, must plead facts showing (1) the existence of a duty…