From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. U.S., 301 Fed.Appx. 199

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-7415.

Submitted: November 20, 2008.

Decided: December 1, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27).

Jacqueline Stanton Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Jacqueline Stanton Stewart appeals the district court's order denying relief on her motion for modification sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stewart, No. 4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27 (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2008; entered July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stewart v. U.S., 301 Fed.Appx. 199

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Stewart v. U.S., 301 Fed.Appx. 199

Case Details

Full title:Jacqueline Stanton STEWART, a/k/a Jackie, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 2008

Citations

301 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2008)