Stewart v. Sw. Bell Tel.

Full title: Antoinne Stewart, Employee/Appellant, v. Southwestern Bell Telephone…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

451 S.W.3d 300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 101366 ED 101323

11-25-2014

Antoinne Stewart, Employee/Appellant, v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 10 N. Tucker Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant. Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, Missouri 65104, for Respondent Division of Employment Security. Paula Finlay, 909 Chestnut, Room 3550, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Respondent Southwestern Bell Telephone.

PER CURIAM

John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 10 N. Tucker Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.

Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, Missouri 65104, for Respondent Division of Employment Security.

Paula Finlay, 909 Chestnut, Room 3550, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Respondent Southwestern Bell Telephone.

Before Angela T. Quigless, C.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Employee Antoinne Stewart appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) determining that he is ineligible for employment benefits. We affirm the Commission's order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).