From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Superintendent & the Attorney Gen. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1673 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1673

08-06-2012

MAGALEEN STEWART v. SUPERINTENDENT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 8), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Document No. 9), the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and,
4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

______________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Superintendent & the Attorney Gen. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1673 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Stewart v. Superintendent & the Attorney Gen. of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:MAGALEEN STEWART v. SUPERINTENDENT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1673 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)