Opinion
CIV-23-832-R
11-29-2023
ANTHONY STEWART, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STITT, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Plaintiff's pro se motion seeking a certificate of appealability [Doc. No. 12]. The Court previously entered an order dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint because it failed to state plausible claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because “a COA is not necessary to appeal from a district court's resolution of § 1983 claims,” Buchanan v. Oklahoma, 398 Fed.Appx. 339, 343 (10th Cir. 2010), Plaintiff's motion is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.