From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Stitt

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Nov 29, 2023
No. CIV-23-832-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 29, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-23-832-R

11-29-2023

ANTHONY STEWART, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STITT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DAVID L. RUSSELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff's pro se motion seeking a certificate of appealability [Doc. No. 12]. The Court previously entered an order dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint because it failed to state plausible claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because “a COA is not necessary to appeal from a district court's resolution of § 1983 claims,” Buchanan v. Oklahoma, 398 Fed.Appx. 339, 343 (10th Cir. 2010), Plaintiff's motion is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Stitt

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Nov 29, 2023
No. CIV-23-832-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Stewart v. Stitt

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY STEWART, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STITT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 29, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-23-832-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 29, 2023)