From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Aug 25, 2020
608 S.W.3d 184 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108053

08-25-2020

Robert STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan Alexander DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Susan Alexander DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Robin Ransom, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Stewart appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2018) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2020).


Summaries of

Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Aug 25, 2020
608 S.W.3d 184 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Stewart v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Aug 25, 2020

Citations

608 S.W.3d 184 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)