From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 2007
948 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 3D06-2915.

February 7, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, John Schlesinger, J.

Joseph Stewart, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Orlando, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, WELLS, and LAGOA, JJ.


Joseph Stewart appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, the defendant alleges that the trial court erred in relying on certain predicate convictions to support adjudicating the defendant as a habitual felony offender. The defendant has raised a facially sufficient claim for rule 3.800(a) relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Consequently, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant's claim. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 2007
948 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Stewart v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph STEWART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 7, 2007

Citations

948 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it shall attach portions of the record that…

DiSanto v. State

The State properly concedes that the trial court's order, which did not include any attachments, should be…