From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2014
CASE NO. CV 13-1153(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 13-1153(PJW)

08-05-2014

ELIZABETH C. STEWART, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY L. SNIFF, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is to file a Second Amended Complaint as to her surviving claims within thirty days of this order.

DATED: August 5, 2014

/s/_________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stewart v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2014
CASE NO. CV 13-1153(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Stewart v. Sniff

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH C. STEWART, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY L. SNIFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. CV 13-1153(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2014)