From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Skolnik

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 23, 2011
2:10-CV-01894-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-01894-PMP-GWF.

March 23, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7) filed February 3, 2011. Although the Court has extended Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' motion, Plaintiff has failed to do so and therefore consents to the granting of Defendants' motion. Moreover, a review of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shows that Defendants are entitled to the relief requested because Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7) is GRANTED and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Skolnik

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 23, 2011
2:10-CV-01894-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Stewart v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:ROGER STEWART, #79447, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

Citations

2:10-CV-01894-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)