From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2005
No. Civ. S 03-0149 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2005)

Opinion

No. Civ. S 03-0149 FCD PAN P.

November 22, 2005


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


October 20, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why claims against defendants Baillie and Harlan should not be dismissed for his failure timely to serve them with process. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). He did not respond.

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends claims against defendants Baillie and Harlan be dismissed without prejudice.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), these findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be filed within 20 days of service of these findings and recommendations. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." The district judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and recommendations in whole or in part.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2005
No. Civ. S 03-0149 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2005)
Case details for

Stewart v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:Michael Stewart, Plaintiff, v. D. Runnels, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 22, 2005

Citations

No. Civ. S 03-0149 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2005)