From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. New York City Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 631 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

April, 1906.

William E. Weaver, for appellant.

Frank A. Acer, for respondent.


At the close of the case it was stipulated upon the record that briefs were to be submitted by January 15, 1906, "and the Court's time for decision to begin to run from that date." The judgment should, therefore, have been rendered on or before January 29, 1906. It was not rendered until January 31, 1906. The court, therefore, lost jurisdiction of the cause and the judgment must be reversed. Moscowitz v. New York City R. Co., 91 N.Y.S. 352; A.M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik, 92 id. 247.

Present: SCOTT, TRUAX and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Stewart v. New York City Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 631 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Stewart v. New York City Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. STEWART, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1906

Citations

50 Misc. 631 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)