From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-687-PK (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-687-PK.

March 19, 2010

Morse Edward Stewart, Vernonia, Oregon, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Teresa M. Shill, Routh Crabtree Olsen, PC, Lake Oswego, Oregon, Attorney for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 9, 2010. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Papak.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak dated February 9, 2010 (#39) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#31) is granted. Judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-687-PK (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Stewart v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MORSE E. STEWART, Plaintiff, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Mar 19, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-687-PK (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)