From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Hooters of America, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 8, 2006
CASE NO. 8:04-CIV-40-T-17-MAP (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:04-CIV-40-T-17-MAP.

February 8, 2006


ORDER


This cause is before the Court on the Defendant's motion for reconsideration and clarification (Docket No. 141) and response thereto (Docket No. 147). The Defendant asks this Court to be allowed to amend it's answer or to clarify the previous order to identify the prejudice to the Plaintiff if amendment were allowed. The Court finds that the motion to reconsider or clarify is not well-taken. The Court agrees with the response that the motion fails on many levels to carry the issues raised. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for reconsideration and clarification (Docket No. 141) be denied. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Hooters of America, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 8, 2006
CASE NO. 8:04-CIV-40-T-17-MAP (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Stewart v. Hooters of America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LYNN D. STEWART, Plaintiff, v. HOOTERS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

CASE NO. 8:04-CIV-40-T-17-MAP (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)