From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 24, 2010
Case No. 5:10-cv-181-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-181-DPM.

September 24, 2010


ORDER


The Court has carefully reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. Stewart has not filed any objections. The Court sees no legal error or clear error of fact on the face of this record as a whole. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition). The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Young's proposed findings and disposition, Document No. 4, as its own. Stewart's petition is dismissed without prejudice for failing to pay the required filing fee, failing to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failing to respond to the Court's prior Order, Document No. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a)(3) (West 2006).

So Ordered.

24 Sept. 2010


Summaries of

Stewart v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 24, 2010
Case No. 5:10-cv-181-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Stewart v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY STEWART ADC #89233 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Sep 24, 2010

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-181-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2010)