From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. City of Irving

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3296-G (BK) (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3296-G (BK)

05-01-2018

KENNETH R. STEWART, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF IRVING, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiffs filed objections, and the court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs' claims against defendants JP Morgan and Texas Industries, Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED. May 1, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stewart v. City of Irving

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3296-G (BK) (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Stewart v. City of Irving

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH R. STEWART, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF IRVING, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3296-G (BK) (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2018)

Citing Cases

Whitten v. Van Den Raadt

Because the Court is without personal jurisdiction over unserved defendants, Plaintiff's claims against…

Starke v. Shipman

The Court should therefore dismiss this lawsuit without prejudice under Rule 4(m).”), report and…