From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR

02-20-2013

CHARLES STEWART (#111347) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Stephen C. Riedlinger dated January 25, 2013 (doc. no. 46). The plaintiff filed an objection which essentially restates his prior argument and has been duly addressed by the Magistrate Judge.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART, dismissing the plaintiffs excessive use of force claims against Capt. Darren Cashio, Lt. Kevin Griffin, Capt. Joseph Barr, Capt. Juan Conrad, and Lt. Col. Warren Foster. In all other respects the defendants' motion for summary judgment should be denied and this matter is referred back to the magistrate judgment for further proceedings on the plaintiffs deliberate indifference claim against Sgt. Raymond Laurent.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 20thday of February, 2013.

________

JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stewart v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Stewart v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES STEWART (#111347) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 20, 2013)