From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02917.

May 19, 2009.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 8, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard E. Lerner and Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellant.

Warner Bernstein Blumenstock, LLP (Ledy-Gurren Bass Siff, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Nancy Ledy-Gurren, Alan Bernstein, and Edward J. Gorman], of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the defendant's showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether it committed medical malpractice in discharging Kevon Stewart, the decedent's son, from its psychiatric facility on May 6, 2004, the plaintiff established the existence of a triable issue of fact ( see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 295-296; Seibert v Fink, 280 AD2d 661; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616, 616-617; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit ( see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 294-295; Engelhart v County of Orange, 16 AD3d 369, 371; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616).


Summaries of

Stewart v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Stewart v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. Med

Case Details

Full title:KERICA STEWART, Respondent, v. BROOKDALE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4049
878 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Huizhen Liu v. Lenox Hill Hosp.

The First Department has also held that where the plaintiff has no doctor-patient relationship with the…

Fox v. Marshall

( Eiseman v. State of New York, 70 N.Y.2d at 188, 518 N.Y.S.2d 608, 511 N.E.2d 1128). Thus, “in limited…