Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03080-WJM-CBS
11-16-2012
MARSHAUN STEWART, Plaintiff, v. BLOODWORTH, BURTON, WORKSON, and HELICKERSON Defendants.
Judge William J. Martínez
ORDER ADOPTING OCTOBER 9, 2012 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
This matter is before the Court on the October 9, 2012 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 69) that Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration (ECF No. 44) be denied. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) any party may serve and file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations with the clerk of the United States District court for the District of Colorado within fourteen days after service of a copy of the Recommendation. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation have to date been filed by either party.
The Court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate.").
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 69) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 44) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
_________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge