From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steward v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00144-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00144-TLN-CKD

06-01-2022

DONNY STEWARD, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 17, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 17, 2022, (ECF No. 5), are adopted in full;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
3. The Court declines to issue the Certificate of Appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Steward v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00144-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Steward v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:DONNY STEWARD, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00144-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)