From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 12, 2018
2018-UP-456 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-456

12-12-2018

Ann Stevenson, Claimant, Appellant, v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Employer, and New Hampshire Insurance Co., Carrier, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2016-000790

Ann Stevenson, of Conway, pro se. Johnnie W. Baxley, III, of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of Mount Pleasant, for Respondents.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2018

Appeal From The Workers' Compensation Commission

Ann Stevenson, of Conway, pro se.

Johnnie W. Baxley, III, of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of Mount Pleasant, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:

As to Appellant's argument that her right hand injury was compensable: Crisp v. SouthCo., Inc., 401 S.C. 627, 641, 738 S.E.2d 835, 842 (2013) ("The claimant has the burden of proving facts that will brings the injury within the workers' compensation law . . . ."); Potter v. Spartanburg Sch. Dist. 7, 395 S.C. 17, 23, 716 S.E.2d 123, 126 (Ct. App. 2011) ("The Appellate Panel is given discretion to weigh and consider all the evidence . . . ."); id. ("The final determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence is reserved to the Appellate Panel."); Fishburne v. ATI Sys. Int'l, 384 S.C. 76, 85, 681 S.E.2d 595, 599 (Ct. App. 2009) ("The Appellate Panel's decision must be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence in the record.").

As to Appellant's remaining issues: Elam v. S.C. Dep't of Transp., 361 S.C. 9, 23, 602 S.E.2d 772, 779-80 (2004) ("Issues and arguments are preserved for appellate review only when they are raised to and ruled on by the [Appellate Panel]."); Linda Mc Co., Inc. v. Shore, 390 S.C. 543, 558, 703 S.E.2d 499, 506-07 (2010) ("An argument not made to an intermediate appellate court and ruled on by that court is not preserved for review in this [c]ourt.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stevenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 12, 2018
2018-UP-456 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Stevenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Ann Stevenson, Claimant, Appellant, v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Employer…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 12, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-456 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2018)