From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevenson v. Benjamin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-00637-BAJ-SDJ (M.D. La. Apr. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-00637-BAJ-SDJ

04-29-2021

CHRISTOPHER STEVENSON v. KEVIN BENJAMIN, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Kevin Benjamin's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 88), seeking dismissal of Plaintiff's claim of excessive force on the sole basis that it is time-barred by Louisiana's one-year limitations period for delictual actions, La. C.C. art. 3492. The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 116), recommending that Defendant's Motion be granted, and that judgment be entered in Defendant's favor because the summary judgment evidence shows that more than one year passed between the date Plaintiff alleges that he was attacked by Defendant, and the date Plaintiff signed his original Complaint in this action, accounting for days tolled while Plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies. The Magistrate Judge further recommends that upon dismissal of Plaintiff's federal excessive force claim, the Court should decline jurisdiction and dismiss any potential state law claims Plaintiff may assert against Defendant. (Id. at 7).

Plaintiff filed a timely objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 117), but has not put forth any evidence to show that the Magistrate Judge incorrectly concluded that Plaintiff's action is time-barred.

Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's Motion, and related filings—including Plaintiff's objection—the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 88) is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Kevin Benjamin be and is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in connection with any potential state law claims, and that any such claims be and are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining pending motions in this matter (Docs. 95, 112, 114) be and are hereby TERMINATED.

Having disposed of all claims in Defendants' favor, the Court will separately issue a final judgment dismissing Plaintiff's action.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 29th day of April, 2021

/s/ _________

JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Stevenson v. Benjamin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-00637-BAJ-SDJ (M.D. La. Apr. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Stevenson v. Benjamin

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER STEVENSON v. KEVIN BENJAMIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 29, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-00637-BAJ-SDJ (M.D. La. Apr. 29, 2021)