From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 25, 1975
314 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Summary

holding that the consideration for the principal debt extends to the guaranty where the evidence indicates that the agreements were entered into contemporaneously

Summary of this case from Lenbro Holding, Inc. v. Falic

Opinion

No. 74-1107.

June 25, 1975.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pinellas County; Mark R. McGarry, Judge.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and E. Earl Taylor, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Affirmed. See State v. Wilson, Fla. 1973, 276 So.2d 45.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stevens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 25, 1975
314 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

holding that the consideration for the principal debt extends to the guaranty where the evidence indicates that the agreements were entered into contemporaneously

Summary of this case from Lenbro Holding, Inc. v. Falic
Case details for

Stevens v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH A. STEVENS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 25, 1975

Citations

314 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Lenbro Holding, Inc. v. Falic

An exception to this general rule is when the underlying contract and the guaranty are executed…