From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Noe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 10, 1923
217 P. 213 (Okla. 1923)

Opinion

No. 11530

Opinion Filed July 10, 1923.

Former Case Controlling.

The syllabus in this case is the same as contained in opinion in case No. 11529, Fred L. Stevens v. W.E. Grisso, which opinion was filed on the 26th day of June, 1923, 91 Okla. ___, 216 P. 671.

(Syllabus by Thompson, C.)

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 5.

Error from District Court, Seminole County; J.W. Bolen, Judge.

Action by Fred L. Stevens against F.R. Noe and T.D. Noe, judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

A C Markley, for plaintiff in error.

A.M. Fowler and Willmott Roberts, for defendants in error.


The facts and issues in this case are similar to those in the case of Fred L. Stevens v. W.E. Grisso (No. 11529), decided on the 26th day of June, 1923, and the decision in that case is decisive of the questions involved in this case, and the opinion in that case is adopted as the opinion in this case.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Noe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 10, 1923
217 P. 213 (Okla. 1923)
Case details for

Stevens v. Noe

Case Details

Full title:STEVENS v. NOE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 10, 1923

Citations

217 P. 213 (Okla. 1923)
91 Okla. 211

Citing Cases

Hudson-Houston Lbr. Co. v. First State Bank

" So we have a valid, uncontested, pre-existing debt due and a valid note secured by what appears to be a…