Opinion
CIVIL 1:24-cv-00225-MR-WCM
11-20-2024
RYAN CRAIG STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. MONTREAT COLLEGE, DR. PAUL J. MAURER, DR. DANIEL T. BENNETT, DR. DOROTHEA K. SHUMAN, and DR. RYAN T. ZWART, Defendants.
ORDER
Martin Reidinger Chief United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 6]. In his Motion, the Plaintiff requests additional time to respond to the Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer [Doc. 2] and the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 4]. The Court will grant the Plaintiff additional time to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. To the extent the Plaintiff seeks additional time to respond to the Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, such request is moot as the Defendant has already responded to the Complaint by way of motion within the time allowed.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 6] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Plaintiff shall have through and including December 4, 2024, to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 4]. Failure to file a timely response will likely lead to the granting of relief that the Defendants seek. The Motion is DENIED as moot to the extent that the Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to respond to the Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer [Doc. 2].
IT IS SO ORDERED.