From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Kendall

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 18, 2022
21-cv-07604-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-07604-WHO (PR)

03-18-2022

DEAN MICHAEL STEVENS, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW KENDALL, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to petitioner was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 5.) Accordingly, this federal habeas corpus action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because petitioner failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, petitioner may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN on the first page.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Kendall

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 18, 2022
21-cv-07604-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Stevens v. Kendall

Case Details

Full title:DEAN MICHAEL STEVENS, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW KENDALL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

21-cv-07604-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2022)