From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Janam

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:19-cv-00670-MCE-KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00670-MCE-KJN P

06-09-2021

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. J. JANAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 23, 2021 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2021 are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants' summary judgment motion (ECF No. 52) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Janam

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:19-cv-00670-MCE-KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Stevens v. Janam

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. J. JANAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-00670-MCE-KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)