From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Grand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 28, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00081-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-CV-00081-RCJ-(WGC)

06-28-2012

THEODORE STEVENS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LE GRAND, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Before the court are petitioner's motion to extend prison copywork limit (#4), motion for more definite statement (#5), and supplemental motion for appointment of counsel (#6). These motions are moot because petitioner is represented by counsel (#11).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to extend prison copywork limit (#4), motion for more definite statement (#5), and supplemental motion for appointment of counsel (#6) are DENIED as moot.

_______________

ROBERT C. JONES

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stevens v. Grand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 28, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00081-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Stevens v. Grand

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE STEVENS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LE GRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-CV-00081-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)