From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Enterprise Developers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1983
441 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

reversing contempt finding where appellant was not given notice of court's intention or adverse parties' desire to hold him in contempt

Summary of this case from Hoffman v. Hoffman

Opinion

No. 83-494.

November 23, 1983. Clarification Denied December 12, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Robert C. Able, Jr., J.

Kenneth G. Stevens of Dale Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

William D. Ricker, Jr., of Fleming, O'Bryan Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


Appellant, Stevens, was held in contempt. He was also ordered to pay $3,000 toward the attorneys' fees of the opposing parties as a sanction for his admitted conduct which the trial court found to be in direct violation of a prior judgment in the case. We reverse the finding of contempt in that appellant was not given appropriate notice of the court's intention or the adverse parties' desire to hold him in contempt. We remand this matter to the trial court with leave to any party or the court to proceed against appellant for contempt if so desired. This reversal is based solely on procedural errors and is not an indication that appellant's conduct was not contemptuous. The appellant has not raised or argued the separate imposition of the $3,000 sanction regarding attorneys' fees and same is thus affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Enterprise Developers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1983
441 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

reversing contempt finding where appellant was not given notice of court's intention or adverse parties' desire to hold him in contempt

Summary of this case from Hoffman v. Hoffman

reversing contempt finding for lack of notice to appellant of court's intention or adverse parties' desire to hold appellant in contempt for appellant's admitted conduct which trial court found to be in direct violation of prior order

Summary of this case from Tschapek v. Frailing
Case details for

Stevens v. Enterprise Developers

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH E. STEVENS AND ROBERT L. ELMORE, APPELLANTS, v. ENTERPRISE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 12, 1983

Citations

441 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Tschapek v. Frailing

The fact that Petitioner admitted her conduct and evinced an intention to continue it does not mean that such…

Hoffman v. Hoffman

However, we direct the trial court, on remand, to strike the finding of contempt, as Wife was not seeking to…