From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Beard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:17-cv-01002-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:17-cv-01002-AWI-SAB (PC)

01-11-2023

LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER FOLLOWING REMAND AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

(ECF Nos. 49, 50)

Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 28, 2019, Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted based on claim preclusion and failure to state a claim and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 38, 39.)

Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on April 22, 2019. (ECF No. 40.)

On December 19, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded this action finding Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical claim was not barred by the state courts rejection of his habeas petition and his claim should proceed on the merits. (ECF No. 49.) The mandate was issued on January 10, 2023. (ECF No. 50.)

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's complaint, filed on July 28, 2017 (ECF No. 1), within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Beard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:17-cv-01002-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Stevens v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

1:17-cv-01002-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)