From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Bancroft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1949
275 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

May 31, 1949.


In an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, order denying defendant's motion to change the place of trial from Kings County to Chautauqua County reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. The proposed witnesses are law enforcement officials, and it appears that not only their convenience will be served but that the ends of justice will be promoted by designating as the place of trial the county where the cause of action arose. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., dissents and votes to affirm. [See post, p. 962.]


Summaries of

Stevens v. Bancroft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1949
275 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Stevens v. Bancroft

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STEVENS, Respondent, v. JOSEPH C. BANCROFT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Slavin v. Whispell

Two of the defendant's witnesses are law enforcement officials and we are entitled to consider their…

McComb v. Hilton Heights Apartments, Inc.

The number of material and necessary witnesses in Monroe County clearly outnumber those in Kings County and…