From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Bainum

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Jan 12, 2015
105 A.3d 98 (R.I. 2015)

Opinion

2014–339–C.A.

2015-01-12

Sona STEVENS, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Vartan Baligian v. Carel BAINUM.

Providence County Superior Court, Associate Justice Sarah Taft–Carter.David J. Strachman, Esq.Carel Bainum, Pro Se


Providence County Superior Court, Associate Justice Sarah Taft–Carter.
David J. Strachman, Esq. Carel Bainum, Pro Se

ORDER

This case came before the Court in conference on the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the defendant's appeal from an interlocutory Superior Court ruling granting the plaintiff's motion for the entry of default. The defendant, in a recent filing with this Court, states that she never received a copy of the plaintiff's dismissal motion. She therefore requests that the plaintiff be directed to refile her motion with proper notice to the defendant so that the latter can respond in a timely manner. However, upon our independent review of the papers in the case, this Court is satisfied that the Superior Court ruling which is the subject of the defendant's instant appeal is clearly interlocutory and was not appealable. Accordingly, no response from the defendant is necessary here.

The motion to dismiss the defendant's appeal as interlocutory is granted.


Summaries of

Stevens v. Bainum

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Jan 12, 2015
105 A.3d 98 (R.I. 2015)
Case details for

Stevens v. Bainum

Case Details

Full title:Sona STEVENS, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Vartan…

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

Date published: Jan 12, 2015

Citations

105 A.3d 98 (R.I. 2015)