From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steven L. Levitt v. Comp. Hand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04095.

Decided May 10, 2004.

In an action to recover damages, the defendants' attorney, Jerold Probst, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), dated May 2, 2003, as, in effect, denied his oral application to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court dated April 8, 2003, as, sua sponte, imposed a sanction against him in the sum of $2,500.

Jerold Probst, New York, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The provision of the order which denied the appellant's oral application did not decide a motion on notice, and therefore is not appealable as of right ( see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Robinson v. State of New York, 287 A.D.2d 610; Stern v. Stern, 273 A.D.2d 298; Velasquez v. C.F.T., Inc., 267 A.D.2d 229; Beige v. Beige, 265 A.D.2d 438). The appellant failed to move for leave to appeal ( see CPLR 5701[c]), and, under the circumstances, we decline to grant leave on our own motion ( see Cuffie v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 260 A.D.2d 423; Aievoli v. Aievoli, 249 A.D.2d 253).

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steven L. Levitt v. Comp. Hand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Steven L. Levitt v. Comp. Hand

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN L. LEVITT ASSOCIATES, P.C., plaintiff, v. COMPUTER HANDLERS CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

Rabinovich v. Shevchenko

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The order appealed from did not…

Krinsky v. Shouela

The appeals from the orders dated November 7, 2007, March 6, 2008, and December 3, 2008, must be dismissed on…