From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steuerman v. Feinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 28, 1963


In a negligence action, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 15, 1963, which granted plaintiff's motion to open his default in failing to serve a complaint within the time prescribed (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 257) and extended such time. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the explanation of plaintiff's counsel that his file of the case had been misplaced, is insufficient to excuse the unreasonable delay of nearly two years in serving the complaint (cf. Gallagher v. City of New York, 19 A.D.2d 623). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steuerman v. Feinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Steuerman v. Feinman

Case Details

Full title:DAVID STEUERMAN, Respondent, v. J. MARTIN FEINMAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Morales v. City of New York

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 1966, which granted plaintiff's motion to serve a…

Jusino v. Green

Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion no satisfactory explanation has been offered…