Sterrett v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

Full title: RICHARD A. STERRETT, Plaintiff, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 7, 2015

Civil Action No. 14-235 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-235

07-07-2015

RICHARD A. STERRETT, Plaintiff, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., et al., Defendants.

Judge Cathy Bissoon

Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
MEMORANDUM ORDER

Magistrate Judge Kelly's ruling regarding Plaintiff's tax returns was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standards of review governing magistrate judges' non-dispositive rulings). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 76) are OVERRULED, and Judge Kelly's ruling is AFFIRMED.

Furthermore, Plaintiff's stated concerns regarding his wife's privacy interests easily may be addressed through redaction or protective order. See Kumar v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 2009 WL 3681837, *3 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2009) (redaction); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570, *3 n.2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2004) (protective order). The Court is confident that counsel can resolve this issue without further judicial intervention.

IT IS SO ORDERED. July 7, 2015

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record