From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterrer v. Calestine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
443 N.E.2d 952 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided November 11, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM T. BELLARD, J.

Solomon Cohen for appellant.

Peter Voletsky and Donald G. Simmonds for respondents.



MEMORANDUM.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff's argument that the earlier action dealt with an implied easement over the surface of the lots rather than an express reservation with respect to sewers and repairs may have been a valid basis for appeal of the prior judgment which held defendants' title absolute and unencumbered and declared plaintiff barred from all claim to an easement in the land. Not having appealed that judgment, however, plaintiff is barred by it from maintaining the present action for the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Sterrer v. Calestine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
443 N.E.2d 952 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Sterrer v. Calestine

Case Details

Full title:ANNA STERRER, Appellant, v. OLIVIA G. CALESTINE et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 11, 1982

Citations

443 N.E.2d 952 (N.Y. 1982)
443 N.E.2d 952
457 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Marinelli Associates v. Helmsley-Noyes Co.

The underlying factual setting is identical, involving the precise claims of overcharging and phantom repairs…

Grammas v. Chamberlain

The Supreme Court properly determined that this action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The instant…