From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sternberg v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

April 12, 1948.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying appellants' motion to amend the answer so as to set forth defenses based on section 29 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, reversed, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. Under all the relevant facts and circumstances there is no prejudice in law to the plaintiff by amendment of the answer so as to set forth facts which were in existence at the time of the service of the original answer, and which facts have no different legal consequences by reason of the delay. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sternberg v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Sternberg v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:SIMEON STERNBERG, Respondent, v. MARY E. WALSH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Kane v. Long Island Jewish Hospital

Said defendants' amended answer, as set forth in the record on appeal, is deemed served as of the time of the…

Hirsch v. Flick

Order dated June 5, 1962, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and defendants' motion to remove…