From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 14, 2017
No. 17-1139 (4th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1139

07-14-2017

PETER K. STERN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR) Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court's orders denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern's motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Stern v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 14, 2017
No. 17-1139 (4th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Stern v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PETER K. STERN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 14, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1139 (4th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)

Citing Cases

Stern v. United States

The Court of Appeals affirmed that decision, Stern v. United States, 693 Fed.Appx. 196 (4th Cir. 2017),…