From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. Sequal Techs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 9, 2012
493 F. App'x 99 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1207

11-09-2012

MICHAEL STERN AND DIGIFLO, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEQUAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

PHILIP P. MANN, Mann Law Group, of Seattle, Washington, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN WHITAKER, Whitaker Law Group, of Seattle, Washington. ANDREW D. SKALE, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C., of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 10-CV-1257, Judge James L. Robart.

JUDGMENT

PHILIP P. MANN, Mann Law Group, of Seattle, Washington, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN WHITAKER, Whitaker Law Group, of Seattle, Washington.

ANDREW D. SKALE, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C., of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Stern v. Sequal Techs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 9, 2012
493 F. App'x 99 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Stern v. Sequal Techs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STERN AND DIGIFLO, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEQUAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

493 F. App'x 99 (Fed. Cir. 2012)