From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. S.C.I. Phx. C.O.s

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 6, 2023
2:23-cv-1722-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1722-KAP

10-06-2023

NIEJEA FRANKLIN STERN, Plaintiff v. S.C.I. PHOENIX C.O.s, Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

KEITH A. PESTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 3, 2023, plaintiff Stern, imprisoned at S.C.I. Phoenix (in Montgomery County), submitted a civil complaint alleging that unnamed corrections officers at Phoenix had lost his property there. Although filed with a facially valid motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the complaint alleges Stern's lost property is worth $450,000. That would be incompatible with ifp status.

I do not resolve that inconsistency because Montgomery County is in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Because plaintiff is there, the events alleged to give rise to the claim happened there, and plaintiff has not identified any defendants, much less any defendants not residing there, under 28 U.S.C.§ 1391(b) venue is proper in the Eastern District and is not proper here.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1404(a), the Clerk shall forthwith transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for disposition as that Court deems appropriate, and mark this matter closed.

Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Niejea Stern MQ-9157

S.C.I. Phoenix

1200 Mokychic Road

Collegeville, PA 19426


Summaries of

Stern v. S.C.I. Phx. C.O.s

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 6, 2023
2:23-cv-1722-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Stern v. S.C.I. Phx. C.O.s

Case Details

Full title:NIEJEA FRANKLIN STERN, Plaintiff v. S.C.I. PHOENIX C.O.s, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 6, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1722-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2023)