From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. Lehr Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).


The IAS Court correctly determined that issues of fact exist, precluding the award of summary judgment in favor of defendant Morgan Grenfell, the lessee of the premises, in an action brought by plaintiff to recover for injuries sustained on the job, against Lehr Construction, the general contractor on the renovation project and his employer, Koenig Iron Works, a subcontractor, on the theory of indemnification. In this action brought pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), the record demonstrates questions exist concerning the respective defendants' and third-party defendant's negligence, if any, with respect to their purported supervision and control over construction work and safety at the accident site. Thus, it would be premature to award summary judgment to Morgan Grenfell (see, D'Amico v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 177 A.D.2d 441, 442-443).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Stern v. Lehr Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Stern v. Lehr Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GIL STERN et al., Plaintiffs, v. LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 78

Citing Cases

Torres-Quito v. 1711 LLC

Finally, the court properly denied Pioneer's motion for summary judgment on its contractual indemnification…

Thompson v. Next Generation Corp.

However, even assuming that the injured plaintiff fell off the roof, there is no evidence that any safety…