From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. Herzmansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

February, 1914.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented, and voted to reverse the order appealed from and to vacate the attachment, on the ground that it does not appear from the papers that the plaintiffs have a cause of action against the defendant.


The order appealed from should be modified by reducing the amount stated in the warrant of attachment to $1,500, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.


Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Stern v. Herzmansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Stern v. Herzmansky

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH W. STERN and EDWARD B. MARKS, Copartners, Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1914

Citations

161 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)