From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterling v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 20, 2012
NUMBER 13-12-00135-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00135-CR

12-20-2012

WILLIAM EDWARD STERLING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, William Edward Sterling, pro se, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Sterling v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 20, 2012
NUMBER 13-12-00135-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Sterling v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EDWARD STERLING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

NUMBER 13-12-00135-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2012)