From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterling v. Hammer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 9, 2015
Civ. No. 15-3983 (ADM/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 15-3983 (ADM/LIB)

12-09-2015

Adam Lee Sterling, Plaintiff, v. Steve Hammer, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED

1. That Plaintiff Adam Sterling's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, [Docket No. 2], is DENIED.

2. That Sterling's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

3. That Sterling's Motions for an "order to P.r.e.A", [Docket No. 3] is DENIED as moot.

4. That Sterling's Motions to change his name to Christine Taylor, [Docket No. 6], is DENIED as moot.

5. That Sterling's Motion for a "pizza party", [Docket No. 7] is DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

s/Ann D. Montgomery

Ann D. Montgomery, Judge

United States District Court DATED: December 9, 2015
At Minneapolis, Minnesota


Summaries of

Sterling v. Hammer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 9, 2015
Civ. No. 15-3983 (ADM/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Sterling v. Hammer

Case Details

Full title:Adam Lee Sterling, Plaintiff, v. Steve Hammer, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 15-3983 (ADM/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 9, 2015)