From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterlin v. Whole Foods Mkt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
21-CV-3707 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-3707 (RA)

08-30-2021

RICHARD STERLIN, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that a settlement has been reached with all parties. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sterlin v. Whole Foods Mkt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
21-CV-3707 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Sterlin v. Whole Foods Mkt.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD STERLIN, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

21-CV-3707 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)