From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stepney v. Beckwith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 23, 2010
392 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-6979.

Submitted: July 30, 2010.

Decided: August 23, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:09-cv-00771-MBS).

Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Wade Stepney, Jr. appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stepney v. Beckwith, No. 8:09-cv-00771-MBS, 2010 WL 293786 (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2010); 2009 WL 1357225 (May 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stepney v. Beckwith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 23, 2010
392 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Stepney v. Beckwith

Case Details

Full title:Wade STEPNEY, Jr., a/k/a Wade Stephney, Jr., a/k/a Wade Stephney, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 23, 2010

Citations

392 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2010)