Stephenson v. Stephenson, 332 So.3d 360, 362 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021).
"On appeal from the denial of a divorce, our standard of review is limited." Stephenson v. Stephenson, 332 So.3d 360, 362 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021). We review the chancellor's findings for "substantial credible evidence" and decline to disturb those findings "unless the chancellor abused [his] discretion, was manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous, or applied an erroneous legal standard."
The chancery court determined that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment and granted a divorce to Glen. "Even if we do not agree with the chancellor or might arrive at a different conclusion, if we cannot say with reasonable certainty that his findings were manifestly wrong and against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, we are still bound by his findings." Stephenson v. Stephenson , 332 So. 3d 360, 362 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021) (quoting Torrence v. Moore , 455 So. 2d 778, 780 (Miss. 1984) ). Accordingly, we find that the chancery court did not err in granting Glen a divorce.