From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 1, 1912
147 S.W. 235 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912)

Opinion

No. 1742.

Decided May 1, 1912.

Catching Fish — Filing Pleadings — Two Days.

The statutes granting two days in which defendant may prepare and file pleadings is mandatory. Article 578, Revised Code Criminal Procedure. Following Reed v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. 35, and other cases.

Appeal from the County Court of Throckmorton. Tried below before the Hon. T.J. Wright.

Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully catching fish; penalty, a fine of $10.

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

C.E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State. — Cited cases in opinion.


The affidavit, which charges appellant with catching and taking fish from a pond and stream and by muddying, ditching and draining and by means of nets and seines, etc., was filed on the 12th day of October, 1911. The information was filed on the same day. The judgment of conviction was entered the same day.

When the case was called for trial appellant made a motion asking that he be allowed the two days provided by statute in which to prepare and file pleadings and make preparation for trial. This was refused by the court, and appellant was placed upon trial. The court signs the bill of exceptions with the statement that when this was done the defendant and his counsel declined to say whether or not time was needed to enable them to get ready for trial. His motion for the two days is all the notice the statute authorizes. The statute grants him two days time when he desires it. The statute is held to be mandatory by the authorities. This action of the court was error. Article 578 of Revised Code of Criminal Procedure; Reed v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. 35; Evans v. State, 36 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Holden v. State, 44 Tex.Crim. Rep.; McFadin v. State, 44 Tex. Crim. 471; Whitesides v. State, 44 Tex.Crim. Rep.; King v. State, 56 S.W. Rep., 926; Johnson v. State, 49 S.W. Rep., 618; Lightfoot v. State, 77 S.W. Rep., 792. These we deem sufficient number of authorities to support the contention of appellant and show error of the court.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Stephens v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 1, 1912
147 S.W. 235 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912)
Case details for

Stephens v. the State

Case Details

Full title:A. STEPHENS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 1, 1912

Citations

147 S.W. 235 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912)
147 S.W. 235

Citing Cases

Moreno v. State

We will find that both appellant and his counsel received all preparation time to which entitled and,…

Arrelano v. the State

The opinion states the case. G. Woodson Morris, for appellant. — On question of being allowed two days to…