But Plaintiffs were—and still are—free to present these arguments in the state court foreclosure proceeding. SeeFroncek v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 2:15-CV-458-FTM-29CM, 2015 WL 12838166, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2015) (denying a temporary restraining order for an alleged RESPA violation under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); Stephens v. Seidman, No. 5:11-CV-16-OC-10KRS, 2011 WL 3156265, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 26, 2011) (denying a temporary restraining order because, "[a]lthough the [p]laintiff has couched several of her claims as violations of federal law, what she is really asking is for this [c]ourt to review a final state court judgment."). Under these circumstances, the Court must abstain from issuing a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction.