From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Roseman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

November, 1934.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff is the landlord; defendant the tenant. The term of the lease was five years and four months, commencing January 1, 1930. Occupancy continued until July 25, 1932, when the property was damaged by fire and rendered wholly unfit for occupancy until September 3, 1932, on which date the premises had been fully repaired, and defendant was notified that they would be ready for occupancy on September 5, 1932. The lease contains a provision "If they [the premises] be so badly injured that they cannot be repaired with reasonable diligence within four months * * * then the lease shall cease." The judgment for rental after September 5, 1932, should be affirmed.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Roseman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Stephens v. Roseman

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN M. STEPHENS, Respondent, v. BERNARD ROSEMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)